• Estate planning

  • Tax planning

  • Forensic audits

  • Acquisitions, mergers and disposals

  • Statutory secretarial services

  • On the job training of your financial staff

  • Due diligence reviews and feasibility studies

  • Accounting services and advice

Copyright 2019 -

Revised debt restructuring tax rules

The Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (TLAB) that was published by the National Treasury on 25 October 2017, contains a revised set of rules that apply to debt restructuring transactions.

This article provides a high level overview of some of the changes that will take effect for years of assessment starting in January 2018.

Scope of the rules

The existing debt reduction rules, which came into effect during 2012, apply when the amount by which a debt is reduced exceeds the consideration for that reduction. As an example, if a person owes a creditor R100, but reaches a settlement in terms of which the person only pays R60 to settle the full debt of R100, a debt reduction of R40 arises. In the context of debt capitalisation transactions, SARS, in Interpretation Note 91, states that a debt reduction may arise if the value of the shares issued to extinguish a debt is less than the amount of the debt. Taxpayers have obtained a number of rulings from SARS for transactions that have a similar effect as a debt capitalisation transaction. However, the rulings confirmed that these proposed transactions did not give rise to debt reductions.

The revised rules will apply to concession or compromise transactions. These transactions consist of two categories. The first category is changes to or waivers of any terms or conditions that apply to a debt. This includes the substitution of debt obligations. The debt benefit, which may have tax implications, in the case of such a transaction is the amount by which the face value of the debt, prior to the arrangement, exceeds the market value of the debt claim (presumably after the arrangement).

The second category relates to debt capitalisation transactions. A debt restructuring falls within this category if the debt is, directly or indirectly, converted or exchanged for shares or is settled by applying the proceeds from shares issued by the company. The amount that may have tax implications in the case of these transactions depends on whether the person who acquired shares in the arrangement held shares in the company before the transaction. If the person held shares before, the debt benefit is the amount by which the face value of the debt before the transaction exceeds the amount by which the market value of shares held by the person in the company increased as a result of the transaction. If the person did not hold shares in the company prior to the transaction, the debt benefit is the amount by which the face value of the debt exceeds the market value of the shares acquired by the person.

It is submitted that the revised rules broaden the situations that may trigger tax implications when debts are restructured. The new rules could arguably apply to situations where the amount of the capital debt outstanding remains fully owing to the creditor. Borrowers in financial distress may find it difficult to restructure their obligations in a manner that does not attract tax consequences, as they may have been able to do previously.


The exclusion from having to make adjustments to the base cost of assets in respect of reduced debts owing between group companies has been replaced with relief from all tax implications of a debt restructuring in the following instances:

  • debts owing by dormant domestic group companies, or
  • debts settled, directly or indirectly, by means of shares issued within a domestic group context.
lloyd viljoen logo2

Financial ownership

Taking charge of your financial destiny
can be a challenge in these trying times.
There are a myriad of factors to
contemplate, some of which may
leave you destitute should you
decide on the DIY option.

Find out more

Follow us